Autonomy thresholds in long-horizon AI Employee tasks
A framework for measuring when an AI Employee crosses from supervised assistant to autonomous executor, with empirical results across coding, research, and operational workloads.
Open research from Syntic on agent autonomy, evaluation, multi-agent orchestration, and the safety properties of an AI Workforce running at scale. We publish what we learn and ship what we publish directly into the platform our customers run.
Four threads run through the lab — how AI Employees act autonomously, how we measure whether they act well, how teams of AI Agents coordinate, and how the entire Workforce stays safe under pressure.
Selected work from the Syntic research team.
A framework for measuring when an AI Employee crosses from supervised assistant to autonomous executor, with empirical results across coding, research, and operational workloads.
How we build evaluation suites that gate every deploy of the Syntic Workforce, why golden datasets out-perform synthetic ones, and what we learned shipping regression tiers in production.
Patterns for supervisor-worker, peer-to-peer, and market-style coordination among AI Agents, with results from real customer Workforces handling concurrent dispatches.
Red-team findings on prompt injection, lateral movement between AI Employees, and sandbox escape attempts — and the runtime guarantees Syntic ships against each.